joe satriani - interact > talk to joe
{JS} Road Discography Gear Interact The Vault
[ Post Message ] [ View New Posts ] [ View All Posts ] [ Mark all as read ] [ Mark all unread ] [ View Archive Talk To Joe Posts ]
View messages from the last [ View Joe Messages Only ] 215369 posts by 17898 (of 168444) members
[Previous Page] { There are 62 posts by woodman300 }
Jump to page: 1 2 3
[Next Page]

woodman300
Dave
CA
Plays: Guitar (2024 years)
62 posts total | IP Logged

hey, Do the Stu, I agree that ITLIS is the best post 2000 cd. I love every song on there but my fave is 'If I Could Fly'. you know one thing though, there are great songs on all the cds, sometimes an album that as a whole may not be a favorite but it has one awsome song on it. I would put Starry night in this group. I especially liked the live version from Denver. I also liked the others from SBM but just not as much. well i am going to the wiltern show, maybe i will see you there. i missed you at the g3 show last time. this time we are sitting way up in the mezz. because i have been so busy i just now got the tickets. the time just got away from me. this time i will be bringing my daughter to the show. she got to see and meet joe a couple years back at west LA music and she is looking forward to it.

woodworking is a hobby for me and i am going to make a guitar in the js1000 style. I haven't decided on the color yet but i was thinking of chrome. they have a chrome paint that is supposed to look really good. another thought was that i could use color changing paint like on the 90thham. any way it comes out i will try to post some photos if anyone is interested.

take it easy

Wed Jul 23 '08 10:00:13 pm Set this message as last read

woodman300
Dave
CA
Plays: Guitar (2024 years)
62 posts total | IP Logged
Hey Samsquanch I am just jumping in here but i was at the live in Anaheim show and i had the meet and greet. Joe was a super guy, very friendly to all and he did sign my Yamaha acoustic guitar. I have heard that he will sign pretty much anything. the best part is that he is just a regular guy with an extraordinary talent. I really enjoyed the whole experience.
Wed Jul 30 '08 9:21:46 pm Set this message as last read

woodman300
Dave
CA
Plays: Guitar (2024 years)
62 posts total | IP Logged
Samsquanch hey i just thought of something. you probably got the phone number of the guy who runs the meet and greet. when i did it it was John Iverson. he was cool and answered all my questions. i might have asked him ahead of time about the guitar but i don't remember. anyway he had given out his cell phone number in case you needed to contact him at last minute, so maybe they did the same for you? hope this helps
Wed Jul 30 '08 9:28:04 pm Set this message as last read

woodman300
Dave
CA
Plays: Guitar (2024 years)
62 posts total | IP Logged
hey burly, i was just reading your message about rifles. you know the thing is that only a tiny percent of people abuse guns. it does not make sense to take things away from everyone because a few people can't use them properly. it is sad of course but that person could just as easily killed people with a car, like happened in santa monica california a few years ago. that guy was an old guy who was unable to drive a car the correct way and we did have a short discussion about banning older drivers, but we didn't because the vast majority of older drivers can use their cars safely. now as for the true purpose of that type of weapon, yes it is designed to kill, just like every other gun. but i (as does the supreme court) put to you that the reason for the second amendment is not for the sole purpose of hunting and sporting rights but is for the security of our nation. in a disaster, natural or otherwise, these types of guns can help protect individuals and communities from the lawless and from the tyrant. remember what a certain progressive dictator of the thirties did. first took the guns away, second eliminated or enslaved his enemies.
Wed Mar 11 '09 3:11:35 pm Set this message as last read

woodman300
Dave
CA
Plays: Guitar (2024 years)
62 posts total | IP Logged
DO THE STU, hey i was scanning the messages and i saw you were talking about Joe Bonamassa. i saw joe at the King of the Blues contest finals at the house of blues. It was pretty good. however, if you want to be blown away, get the dvd live at rockpalast. i think that is what its called. it was a live performance at a german club in 2005. it was really a great show and i have watched it a bunch of times. you can probably find some clips on you tube.
Wed Jan 13 '10 7:06:10 pm Set this message as last read

woodman300
Dave
CA
Plays: Guitar (2024 years)
62 posts total | IP Logged
skippygirl that new law in arizona is really not a new law. they simply took existing federal law and mandated that it be enforced. the federal law was passed in 1940. what they will be doing now is when a person is legally stopped for whatever reason they would have already been stopped, the officer will ask for their immigration status. if they are driving and have no license, then that is an indication that they may not be legal. the people of Arizona have passed this law with a large majority of support because they are in a war zone with the mexican drug cartels. they average 1 kidnapping a day there and most recently, a rancher who routinely helped the illegals when they passed thru his land was shot and killed by suspected grug smugglers. i think that as times continue to be tough financially on American citizens you will find broad support for laws that try to stop illegal immigrants for getting the benefits of free education for thier children and free medical attention. polls taken recently show this to be the case. i think it is also prudent to take a look at the immigration laws of Mexico which are much harsher then here. just being illegal once there gets you two years in prison and if caught a second time its ten years. i think we would all like to help the less fortunate, but there is a limit to the resources and i think American citizens should be the first to beneifit from tax dollars which are taken from them.
Tue May 4 '10 12:27:43 am Set this message as last read

woodman300
Dave
CA
Plays: Guitar (2024 years)
62 posts total | IP Logged
meyersbw, what exactly is wrong with the Aizona law? it is exactly the same as the federal law we have lived with for seventy years. all they did was make the federal a state law so it could be enforced. since it seems that we can add federal border enforcement to the list of jobs that 'americans won't do'
Tue May 11 '10 5:27:54 pm Set this message as last read

woodman300
Dave
CA
Plays: Guitar (2024 years)
62 posts total | IP Logged

hey do the stu.

i have been listening to joe for a long time and some people i know like him and listen but not nearly as many as you would think, same goes for some of the other bands i have heard about since i found joe. i knew about joe in the 80s but didn't really wake up to him until the 2000s. since then i have looked at the bands that t2j people like and post about as well as the g-3 guys and the guests joe has had over the years. so far i am really into joe bonamassa and dream theater. andy timmons live is an awesome dvd and of course eric johnson too. i like erics cds better than the dvds though. i just wish we could get more material from him. i am really glad that guys like you post links to these guys so we can all find out about them. thanks

Tue May 11 '10 5:49:25 pm Set this message as last read

woodman300
Dave
CA
Plays: Guitar (2024 years)
62 posts total | IP Logged

brad,

i look at it this way, the country is your home. the front door is the border and you have filled the house with your stuff that you earned the money and payed for. now maybe you have no problem helping a few guys from down the street. but at some point you need to close your door. we all close our doors at night when we sleep because we don't want uninvited guests. even churches keep their doors closed sometimes. if you leave it open then someone comes in. if its a guy thats hungry he takes your food, if he's sick he takes your medicine, if he's a crook he steals your stuff or kills your wife and grabs your daughter. even if you are the nicest guy in the world, who doesn't mind giving everything away, eventually you run out of stuff. that's where arizona is now. thats the way i see it anyway.the solution to our problem is outside the border. somehow we need to help our neighbors fix their home so they can live there, and prosper, and enjoy what life has to offer.

Tue May 11 '10 10:25:00 pm Set this message as last read

woodman300
Dave
CA
Plays: Guitar (2024 years)
62 posts total | IP Logged
hey guitarvibes, i think the price of the meet and greet is set so that there is a limited number af people. plain supply and demand. if they priced it lower, lots of people would buy the package and no one would be satisfied with the result. over the years they have probably kept track of how many people are wiling to pay for the privelige of meeting Joe and set the price so that they get a manageable number of guests. i don't think they are trying to take advantage. i suppose they could simply limit the nimber of guests to the meet and greet though, and charge less. but then people would complain they couldn't get a ticket. yo also have to keep in mind that when joe does these, he is willing to sign all your stuff which is pretty cool. a lot of other artists don't do that and some will only sign their own signature gear. that being said it is not cheap. i did it once at the live in anaheim show in 2006 and i thought it was worth the money. Joe was a very down to earth guy with a sense of humor and the guy running the meet and greet, john iverson was also really cool. i wish it could have been longer but it was still worth it. and he signed my daughter's acoustic guitar too.
Sun May 23 '10 1:46:22 pm Set this message as last read

woodman300
Dave
CA
Plays: Guitar (2024 years)
62 posts total | IP Logged
michelle, i know what you mean about the seats. when i got the meet and greet it came with tickets. now there were only a dozen people who got the meet and greet and this venue was the grove in anaheim which is set-up with dinner tables in front. you actually go in and eat dinner before the first act. they had all of the meet and greet people at my table.the problem i had was the even though i had front row center tickets, the standing area was actually in front of us. unfortunately, the standing room was only one or two steps down from my level so when they stood in front of me, they were actually about the same height so my view was blocked. this was very disappointing but it is really the venue, not the performer's fault. when i figured the price, it wasn't too damn bad because i got my seat, my dinner and the meet and greet for about 200. now when i go to a show, since i want an unobstructed view, i try to get a seat that is front row balcony or front row of a section. it all depends on the venue, but most of the places that Joe plays are not huge so you still have a great view. i do wish it really was first come first served but i understand that the performer is going to reserve seats for guests at some shows. if you really want to see the best possible show the best way is to bite the bullet and spend the cash for scalped tickets up front. a friend of mine did that for a dream theater concert in NY and ended up all over that dvd they made. and just by chance, the guy he sat with in the front knew the drummer so they got backstage after the show. you almost can't put a price on that!
Sun May 23 '10 5:46:06 pm Set this message as last read

woodman300
Dave
CA
Plays: Guitar (2024 years)
62 posts total | IP Logged
well i went to soundstrike website. it is full of disinformation. it says cops will be racially profiling, it makes it sound like the posse will be out to hunt people down and kill them. i don't get why there is a boycott. the law in arizona is LESS enforcement than the federal law. they will not be hunting people down. they will simply check when they do detain someone for a violation. illegal aliens have broken the law by coming here and they are not entitled to to live in the US without authorization. sending them home is not wrong. if soundstrike intends to boycott arizona then they have to boycott the entire united states. and they have to double boycott Mexico because they have truly Draconian immigration laws. I am deeply disappointed with soundstrike.
Wed May 26 '10 9:06:14 pm Set this message as last read

woodman300
Dave
CA
Plays: Guitar (2024 years)
62 posts total | IP Logged
minimoog, i think you should look at the polling data. a huge majority are for this new law. and remember it is no different then the federal law we already have. democracy, for once, is working. the people spoke and a law was crafted to deal with the problem. a recent poll asked if you wanted the number of illegal aliens to go up, go down or stay the same. 75% want it to go down. only 2% want it to go up. in a recent meeting with republicans, the president, seeing there is a huge problem here asked what do you want. they told him seal the border and then we can talk about what to do with the people that are here. he said you can forget about that. now if you want to talk about democracy not working, what about the health care law that was rammed down our throats against the will of the people. most of America did not want gov't run health care but they didn't care, they gave it to us anyway, and conveniently, that law takes effect after a possible second Obama election. most Americans care about the poor but there is a limit to what we can do. it is easy for rich people to stand up and say why can't we help these people? they will never run out of what they need to live. but us working class think maybe we want to send our kid to college but it costs so much and then we see an illegal alien getting tuition to go paid for with tax dollars. something seems wrong there.
Fri May 28 '10 10:25:24 pm Set this message as last read

woodman300
Dave
CA
Plays: Guitar (2024 years)
62 posts total | IP Logged

regarding the fan question

i believe the term 'fan' is short for fanatic. To answer the questions,

Do you think you can be a fan if you know the name of the band, but don't know any names of the songs? no. a fan knows the names of most or all of the songs and also knows about the band's history and members.

Do you think you can be considered a fan if you don't feel the need to buy any of their albums or have no interest in going to a concert? no. if you are a fan, you have at least some of the band's work and you have interest in going to a concert. you may not be able to go due to where you live but you want to. you don't need to own everything a band has ever created. the group may have changed over time and the music styles could be way different- early doobie brothers vs. later doobie brothers is an example.

Is there a line between "I'm a fan of (that band)" and "I like their work"??? yes. many people like lots of band's music but they may not be true fans.

And finally. If you were to ask a person if they were a fan of something, do you think it should only be a yes or no answer?? Is being a fan black or white, or are their shades of gray in between? yes or no. no shades of gray.

just my two cents

btw i have been a true Joe fan for years and i am also a recent fan of joe bonamassa, dream theater, andy timmons. even with all the music choices i have, i still find myself listening to these most of the time. i guess i am a true fan of guitar.

Mon Feb 14 '11 9:54:43 pm Set this message as last read

woodman300
Dave
CA
Plays: Guitar (2024 years)
62 posts total | IP Logged

Well, tomorrow is Joe's birthday. I was thinking it would be a really cool idea if those who can give would give to charity in Joe's honor. There are tons of places - near and far. Soup kitchens, animal shelters, local places in your area, or bigger organizations like United Way, Interational Red Cross, ChildFund, ASPCA, Charity Water, or any other place that's near to your heart.

That is a great idea, my wife and i support the wounded warrior project. www.woundedwarriorproject.org/

they do so some good work for people who gave so much for our country and way of life.

Sat Jul 14 '12 4:28:22 pm Set this message as last read

woodman300
Dave
CA
Plays: Guitar (2024 years)
62 posts total | IP Logged

Michelle, i can see how strongly you feel about this. i feel for those people in Colorado too. whether you like it or not, the militia is every able-bodied person of age. that is how it was when they wrote our Constitution. all the citizens were expected to provide their own arms and defend the nation. it seems to me that when people form militias and practice so they can actually do the job, certain people tend to get worried and upset, and try to stop the militias from organizing. the whole purpose of an armed public is to protect us from the rule makers, the government. that is a tough job now that we have a standing army, but nonetheless that is what the militia is for. the other thing is, that the bill of rights is not a list of rights granted to us by the government, it is a list of natural rights that every person has, given to him by his creator. there are a lot more people alive because of guns then there are dead because of them. there certainly are not 100,000 deaths from gun violence each year. tragedies like this happen in spite of laws against gun ownership. i do agree with you that in a crowded theater, with no clear target, it would have been difficult for armed citizens to stop this guy. i am sure there were warning signs that this guy was not right in the head. now as far as the weapon he used, there are probably hundreds of different guns that fire the same cartridges that he used. there is nothing more powerful about that gun than the others. the highest crime rates are where the guns have been taken from the people. if the people of this country want to dis-arm the public, they can make a constitutional amendment and do it the right way. i doubt if that will happen in my lifetime. it is more likely that the government will try to 'protect us from ourselves'

Sun Jul 22 '12 6:25:41 pm Set this message as last read

woodman300
Dave
CA
Plays: Guitar (2024 years)
62 posts total | IP Logged

its ok if we disagree Michelle.i didn't see the author's name at the bottom the first time i read it so i thought they were your words.

the founders wrote the Constitution a long time ago and they did it right. they knew there would be things that needed changed over time. but they didn't want a small majority like 50.001% to dictate to the other 49.999%. that is why it is so hard to amend the Constitution. it should be hard. it takes 3/4 of the states to pass an amendment. you can be sure that if an amendment is passed, then it was the will of the people.

'there is NO NEED for a public citizen to own a semi-automatic weapon. NONE. If you can't defend yourself and your family with a pistol or hunting rifle, then that's just to bad.'

the right to bear arms is not just to protect your family, it is to defend the nation. that was the will of the founders. if you want to change that, you have to convince 75% of the people. otherwise you have to live with it or move elsewhere. i live in the people's republic of california and we have some strict gun control here but i was born here and i like the climate so i put up with the curtailment of my rights.

'I want you to have to fill out 22 gaddamn pages of information and have a double and even triple background check to be able to own one. I want every gun owner to have gun safes and gun locks. '

if we had to do what you want, it would violate the Constitution. there can be no infringement on the right to bear arms. in many places there is a total ban. it isn't right. i sometimes wish they would make people take a test and fill out papers before they vote. or give the lawmakers a drug test before they vote. hell, how about they just ask for ID to make sure who you are. but its not going to happen. so i live with it.

i really don't know what to say about the "the lies of the NRA' . that organization has been around a long time and they are all about defending the rights of regular people. just imagine that instead of the second amendment that was being attacked, it was the first amendment. you wouldn't stand for it. you would fight back. imagine a background check before you could post back to this forum, or a fee every time you wrote your newspaper. the NRA reports to its members what our elected representatives are voting on and how it affects our rights.

i think we all want the same thing, which is to live a happy and safe life. we just have different ideas on how to do that.

Sun Jul 22 '12 11:17:09 pm Set this message as last read

woodman300
Dave
CA
Plays: Guitar (2024 years)
62 posts total | IP Logged

' a document written in 1700's by a bunch of guys in pantaloons and wigs is supposed to be solid gold and still fit into today's standards??'

Michelle, the constitution is up to date. it has been amended 27 times, the most recently in 1992. the second amendment is not about the right to sporting arms, it is about the right of military arms. the supreme court has decided that the second amendment applies to military style weapons and it is an individual right. the only way to change it is by amendment. those guys in pantaloons were the founding fathers and they were a pretty smart bunch of guys. not perfect, but that is why they made a way to update the document as needed.

'Votes here in America are bought and paid for by corporations and entities like the NRA.' agreed, just include Big Hollywood, left wing media, and the unions.

'How many stories have you or anyone you know read where a citizen had to use a semi-automatic rifle to protect themselves from a home intruder or a mugger on the street? How many bullets does it take to drop a dear or whatever animal you're hunting for food? One, maybe two. They can be dropped by a sharp stick with a point on it! No need for automatics there.'

there have been lots of incidences of self defense with firearms. probably many more with handguns than long guns. there are legitimate uses of all these guns.

'I believe people are more in love with their entitlement than with what's right or better for society as a whole. As long as it's somebody else getting slaughtered, it's not your problem. '

i think you could substitute the word 'taxed' for slaughtered to make that a correct statement.

i get the feeling i will never change your mind but i urge you to read the constitution and some of the writings our founders left about it. maybe look at the NRA website to see what they are all about. anyway, this is not really the forum for this type of discussion.

Mon Jul 23 '12 4:51:26 pm Set this message as last read

woodman300
Dave
CA
Plays: Guitar (2024 years)
62 posts total | IP Logged
its cool!
Mon Jul 23 '12 10:14:16 pm Set this message as last read

woodman300
Dave
CA
Plays: Guitar (2024 years)
62 posts total | IP Logged
hey Joe, i watched the vid of you showing the guitars on the wormhole tour. i had a orange '73 camaro and that color is exactly the same as that orange guitar. its also very similar to the new orange camaro. it does look better on the car though. i wish Ibanez would make the light blue guitar with the single coils available. that would be cool.
Fri Aug 3 '12 5:45:37 pm Set this message as last read

woodman300
Dave
CA
Plays: Guitar (2024 years)
62 posts total | IP Logged

hey michelle, it's me again.

'WTF is wrong with these people?? Then to go spreading that bullshit in other countries? Really? People like Mustaine and Nugent and all those other America (loving??) hating idiots need to pack their bags and gtfo and go live in the wild lands somewhere in Bumfuck where they can be mayor Fuckall of their own make believe town.

"Hello me, meet the real me" - No thanks Dave, I've seen enough.

Absolutely mind blowing. I don't think any president in the history of the US has been this blatantly disrespected.'

really? i guess you weren't around the last 10 years or so when literally every democrat and celebrity disrespected America and the president in regards to the war against islamic terror and everything else.

remember the 911 conspiracy? bush had explosives planted in the building when it was built?

Dave Mustaine hasn't said anything worse than some of the idiots on the left. doesn't make it right, but i wouldn't get my panties in a bunch over it. if you weren't upset about sean penn "theres no weapons of mass destruction here" or alec baldwin " we should stone henry hyde to death and kill his family" then this shouldn't bother you at all.

Sat Aug 18 '12 1:11:09 pm Set this message as last read

woodman300
Dave
CA
Plays: Guitar (2024 years)
62 posts total | IP Logged

'So all the people who voted for McCain in that election because he was white (soooo white) is not the same in what way? '

people vote for many reasons but i don't think you can say they voted based on skin color. i would vote for any conservative with a good plan regardless of skin color. it just doesn't matter. what does matter is that socialism is a failed system. it has never worked in the long run because once the majority realize they can vote themselves money from the treasury, the system collapses. google the real story of thanksgiving and you will understand why socialism can't work.

Sat Aug 18 '12 1:20:45 pm Set this message as last read

woodman300
Dave
CA
Plays: Guitar (2024 years)
62 posts total | IP Logged

'A president has the responsibility and duty to take care of the many, not the few.'

i would have to disagree with that statement. the duty of the president is to execute and enforce the laws written by us, the people.

it is every persons own responsibility to take care of themselves. it is the price of freedom. when someone else pays the bills they have a say in how you live your life. think what your parents said to you 'as long as you live under this roof, you will live by our rules'. it is no different with the gov't and the people.

the Bush policies did not lead us down this path. the democrats took over congress in 2006. it took them 2 years to destroy the economy so they could get their guy in.

Sat Aug 18 '12 1:49:03 pm Set this message as last read

woodman300
Dave
CA
Plays: Guitar (2024 years)
62 posts total | IP Logged

i am not sure what you expect republicans to do. we believe that the policies of the liberals will destroy the country eventually. so we try to stop it. just the same way the liberals would try to stop any conservative efforts. why does this bother you? i guess anyone who is well to do is an idiot. does that include rich liberals?

we don't have to show id in the people's republic of california to vote.

""Section 303(b)(2) specifies the ID requirements for voters who vote in person or by absentee ballot.

"In person" voters must show a "current and valid photo identification" or "a copy of a current utility bill, bank statement, government check, paycheck, or other government document that shows the name and address of the voter."

"Absentee voters" must submit with their ballot one of the documents listed above.

The Secretary of State, in accordance with Elections Code section 14310 (e), has promulgated emergency regulations defining the documents a voter may use to prove ID to vote (see FAQ #3 --- Standards for proof of residency when proof is required by HAVA – Section 20107 of Title 2 of the California Code of Regulations). Is there any way a voter can avoid having to show ID when he or she votes?

Yes.

First, the requirement only applies to voters who have never voted in the county in a federal election. Persons who were already registered as of January 1, 2003, or who change address within the county and re-register, are not required to show ID to vote.

Second, voters who do not register to vote "by mail" are not required to show ID to vote.

Third, Section 303(b)(3) states that if the voter provides his or her driver's license number, or the last 4 digits of his or her social security number, on the form to register to vote, and the elections official can verify the number is correct, then the ID requirement does not apply.""

i think the citizens are concerned that those who get public assistance may not have a legal right to vote, but are still voting. it is very easy here in california to get a fake id, even a fake social security card. we all know which side they will vote for. i live near a sanctuary city where there are millions of illegal aliens. i have heard reports that voters in democratic districts have gone back to the polls after closing and witnessed them stuffing the ballot box. there is indeed voter fraud.

i don't know why you hate the rich so much, but hate will burn you from the inside. in this country we are all still allowed to make our own way in life. some are happy with little and others want to have more. take another look at the richest list and notice that some of them are rich liberals who give to the obama machine.

http://www.fec.gov/disclosurep/PCandCompare.do

http://www.fec.gov/disclosurep/PCandCompare.do

check out the links, they show how much was collected and spent by each candidate.



Edited Wed Sep 19 '12 8:18 pm

Wed Sep 19 '12 8:14:45 pm Set this message as last read

woodman300
Dave
CA
Plays: Guitar (2024 years)
62 posts total | IP Logged

If you're stealing SS# and making fake ID's, are you really going to be stupid enough to even care to vote and have your name filed with the government? THAT'S NOT HOW CRIMINALS WORK! It's a FEAR TACTIC!!

they're fake ids. they don't use a real name. and yes i think some illegal aliens do vote. there was a local congressional race a few years back, don't remember exactly when but there was a town hall type meeting and the democrat running for re-election was asking for the crowd to vote for her on tuesday. one person said she couldn't vote because she didn't have 'papers'. the candidate said 'there are ways around that'. i remember that because it was taped and i heard it played. i really think that some people will commit voter fraud because they think the ends justify the means.

i don't think it is racist to expect that people who want to come here from other countries should follow the rules. it cost a lot of taxpayer money to educate their children, treat the ill, food stamps, transportation etc. way more than most of these people can possibly earn. i certainly don't want them to vote, because of course they will vote for the guy who will keep the services coming and not lift a finger to deport them. maybe you have to live here to understand the way it is.

as for whether you hate the rich, it just sounded like it to me from the tone of your post. i apologize if i was wrong. i agree with you that the money situation poisons the election system. i had an idea that we could ban all spending for the candidates and give them all the air time they would need for free. the airwaves belong to the people after all. you should check out those links i posted before. i think you will see that obama outraised and out spent the others by a wide margin.

Wed Sep 19 '12 10:34:39 pm Set this message as last read
[Previous Page] Jump to page: 1 2 3 [Next Page]
Try the Advanced Search (Beta)

SHARE THIS PAGE
[ ©1995-2010 joe satriani ]--[ site by chime ]--[ credits ]--[ contact ]
You are using this browser: Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)