Did you hear her say there are ILLEGAL ways around that, because that's not what I saw you write? Do you think maybe she might have instructed her on some other form of ID or paperwork to make it allowable for her to vote? It sounds like you heard what you wanted to hear. It's pretty hilarious how ONLY Democrats are alleged vote stealers and ballot stuffers low life bottom feeders using government money to live because they're to lazy to fend for themselves.

it was pretty obvious, if you heard it. she was instructing an illegal alien how vote. as far as stuffing, you may remember jfk and the alleged voter fraud in illinois. isn't that where bho used to live? hmm. isn't that where the governor tried to sell bho's vacated senate seat? i said before, i think democrats (read liberals) have no problem breaking the rules because they think they are doing the right thing. its because so many people out there think of republicans as evil. no problem breaking the rules because you have t stop the evil republicans before they take away you free stuff. i can't see how one rich conservative is worse than one rich liberal. liberals want to take from people who earn a living and give it to people who don't. they certainly don't want the poor to not be poor because without them, they can't win the election. bho is essentially buying votes with our tax money. that should piss you off.

all we want is for the people we elect to follow the law. the constitution limits the power of government greatly by design. if you actually read the document, you will find that most of the govt programs we have now are not allowed.

for the record, i am not apposed to Americans availing themselves of programs they are entitled to, but am apposed to the millions who were not invited here and take the free stuff. think of the United States as your house. the border is your front door that you left open. some guy just walked into your house uninvited. he stole your books to get educated, he took your food and ate it, he took your medicine. now you have to borrow 16 trillion dollars to get food medicine and books for your kids.

my motto for elections from now on is vote American. and for those in california, 'if its Brown, flush it down'

PS Michelle,

Hate? I believe I see you used the words, kind of people "I despise", when speaking of Romney and Trump.

Ever heard the one about glass houses and throwing stones?

michelle,

"Uh-ohs! Voter fraud.

What what??

They hired a firm that had already been accused of dumping the oppositions registration forms. Say it ain't so! That would be...BUYING THE VOTES??

i thought you said that voter fraud was a myth. i may have got you confused with one of the liberals where i work. they claim there is no such thing as voter fraud. i am glad the firm was fired. i doubt that the democrats would have a big problem with it though because they think it is ok to break the rules as long as they get the results they are looking for. i was still hoping you would comment on the candidate spending links i posted that shows obama outspending the other candidates.you know it is a myth that obama comes from a poor background. after his murky beginnings living abroad, he went to the best schools and became a rich man. now that is ok by me, but don't attack your opponent for being 'out of touch rich guy' when you are one also.

'The only time romney wasn't lying in that debate was when I had the TV muted. If romney wins, I'm moving to Canada.'

we'll get a collection going for you expenses. you'll love it there. they have socialized medicine. you only have to wait about 18 months for major operations.

obama didn't have a teleprompter for him to read. its not his fault. no one could have won that debate against romney. the altitude was too high, obama has been too busy meeting with world leaders and fighting global terror. his wife won't let him eat the way he wants

'How low can you go?'

did you read the letter?

i think this points out the reality of our country. those who sacrifice and work hard will reap the benefit. he specifically told his people to vote what is right for them. he then spelled out the reality and consequences of that choice. the same way my union spells it out for me. they say 'vote for this guy or you might lose your benefits or job'. i assume you have no problem with labor organizations 'helping ' its members to make the right choice. this is no different.

here in california we are being forced to choose between raising taxes or cutting school budget. they list all the things that may be cut if we don't vote for higher sales tax (a regressive tax that hurts the poor), higher income tax that applies to all. all the items listed could be considered to be vital services. they omit things like the not needed high speed rail. the rail project is very stylish however. our democrat governer is making us choose higher taxes or else. a threat.

so i would read the letter again if i were you and look at it from a different perspective. maybe put aside your class warfare mentality.

i re-read the letter again and it sounds exactly the same as the kind of letter i get every month from my union. they say 'we urge you to vote for your jobs, vote democrat!' he didn't say he would fire people. he simply said this president's policies are bad for his company and it may not grow in the next 4 years and it may in fact shrink.

now remember you are the one who threw that link out there with the caption 'how low can you go' . it seems to me there are 2 ways to read that letter. one is the conservative way, one is the liberal way. more and more it seems the liberal way encourages people to think of the earners, the people who work hard to attain wealth as evil or wrong or undeserving. i prefer to look at it as a success story. someone who decided to risk his fortune to build a business that employs thousands of people.

using your logic, if Siegel's business is doing better than ever under Obama's regime than why would he threaten his employees to vote the other way? more than likely, he judges what the current president's plans are for the future and determines if it will help or hurt his business. just like labor unions do, spending millions to influence electors to vote for this candidate and that proposition. in this case, the president believes in income redistribution, he has said so. he intends to raise taxes 1 trillion dollars, joe biden said so. this causes siegel's taxes to go up, the people who buy his product will buy less because they have less. then he would have to lay-off workers or pay to have them sitting idle. if it were your business, what would you do?

'Nobody is PRO abortion ferchristsake! Unless you are willing to take in all these babies being born to women who can't afford them, are to young to handle them, don't want them and they will live a life of hell because of it, have no child care to continue school or work, or are addicted to drugs, then you shouldn't really have a say in what women choose to do with their own bodies.'

'At least when they get to the age of reason, there are places like PP that will help educate and protect them.'

i am sure that in some ways planned parenthood is providing a needed service. the poor and the young are the ones getting free abortions payed for by the taxpayer. others who have insurance can go to their normal doctor and have the fetus killed on their own dime.

I'm just wondering...with this clause of only allowing abortion in the case of rape or incest. Of course, they have to decide what kind of rape it is, date rape, stranger rape, uncle Charlie rape, etc. Then they have to prove that it was actually rape, in which the woman/girl is victimized all over again. Then it has to run through all the red tape, medical findings, criminal findings etc. This doesn't happen overnight, and in most cases drags on for weeks, months, or even years. In the meantime, the victim is being dragged through the mud, emotionally tortured to relive her abuse over and over again, and the baby is getting bigger and bigger.

Don't forget to check Politifact.com over the next few days to see if your liar lied more than my liar.

you might want to try a different fact check site. the one you use is biased to the left. they routinely state something is false or true and clearly it is an opinion. for instance, when romney said obama went on an apology tour, your site said liar, completely false. now that is their opinion. i saw the same speeches and came to the conclusion that obama thought the us was wrong and he was indeed apologizing. he even told some of the world leaders to wait until his second term and he could do 'more'.

check out these links

http://ethicsalarms.com/2012/06/12/politifact-bias-the-smoking-gun/

http://www.politifactbias.com/

it may not change your mind, but at least give it some thought.

10 minute version of Searching. I don't remember which dvd that was on, but it's my fav :-)

hey william, check out this page